Insight News

Saturday
Dec 20th

The future of Minnesota is at stake in budget debate

E-mail Print PDF
mark-daytonThis state government shutdown is painful for many Minnesotans.  I am often asked, “Why?  Why are you and Republican legislators putting us through these hardships?”

I believe that the future of Minnesota is at stake.  Our way of life, what makes Minnesota special and successful, hangs in the balance.

Will we continue to have one of the best higher education systems in the world?  Not with the 19% funding cut to the University of Minnesota and the 14% reduction to MnSCU campuses that the Republicans proposed.  A mediocre educational system will lead to a mediocre state economy in the years ahead.

Will we continue services, which enable senior citizens to live in their own homes, rather than being forced into more expensive nursing homes?  One elderly couple would be forced to place the husband in a nursing home, if their assisted living services were eliminated.  The wife would be left without her husband and her home.

Will we continue to provide people with disabilities with the support they need to live independent and productive lives?  Not by reducing the amount of time their personal care attendants can spend with them.  Not by cutting the funding for special education.  And not by denying affordable health care to many of them, as well as senior citizens and families with children.

That is some of what is at stake for the future of Minnesota.

My budget cuts healthcare costs and reduces the state workforce; but it also invests in public schools, funds all-day kindergarten, and protects college students from huge tuition increases. I continue to fund cities and counties to keep down property taxes. My latest budget plan increases taxes only on people making more than a million dollars a year in Minnesota, which affects only 7,700 people.  Thus, over 99% of Minnesotans would see no income tax increase and no state-imposed property tax increase from my proposal.

Republicans remain absolutely opposed to asking the very richest Minnesotans to pay more in taxes.  Instead, their budget would raise property taxes by $1.4 billion over three years on homeowners, businesses, and renters. 

Senior citizens, people with disabilities, children born into poverty, college students from middle-income families and their parents would also pay the price for Republican legislators’ refusal to ask the richest Minnesotans to pay even a single dollar more in taxes.

In our democracy, if the voters give their “mandate” entirely to one party in an election, then that party has the right to determine policy until the next election.

However, when the voters deliver a split verdict, as they did in Minnesota last November, then neither side is entitled to have it all their way.  For the past two months, I have offered again and again to compromise, and meet the Republicans half-way.  They have refused to compromise to reach an agreement.

I have offered over $2 Billion in cuts to existing programs, and proposed to raise income taxes only on taxpayers who earn over one million dollars per year.

The Republicans said No.

In the spirit of compromise, I said I would agree to raise taxes on cigarettes, even though I do not personally support such a tax increase.  

The Republicans said No.

No compromise.  Republican legislators insist on having it all their way, or no way.  That is not responsible, or even rational, leadership.

If this budget impasse is to be resolved fairly and equally, respecting each side’s mandate, then the Republicans and I must both compromise.  That was the will of the people of Minnesota expressed in last year’s election.  That is what the people of Minnesota want and deserve today.
 

Recent Comments

Powered by Disqus



Facebook Twitter RSS Image Map

Latest show

Business & Community Service Network